Today’s guest post is by Lee Paczulla, a Master of Divinity student at Harvard Divinity School and intern for Social Action Ministries. In it, she contemplates whether interfaith social action, which could be defined as a “ministry,” has a place for the nonreligious. What do you think?

Interfaith work for social action often brings our communities of faith and spiritual practice into partnerships with unfamiliar groups. When we unite around common goals for improving our states, cities and towns, we also realize the potential to learn more about one another’s practices and beliefs. Relationships forged through interfaith work can help to counter the forces of ignorance and fear that creep into our culture as anti-Semitism or Islamophobia – or as unfamiliarity with underrepresented religious groups in America like SikhsJains, or members of the Baha’i faith. If you are involved in any kind of faith-based social action partnership, you have probably encountered people who believe, worship and practice in ways that are unfamiliar to you.

How then should people of faith consider partnerships with communities of people who profess no religious faith? All across the country, many Humanists, atheists, and members of Ethical Societies are also moved to engage in social action because of their beliefs. In his recent article for The Huffington Post, Chris Stedman writes: “Humanism ought to be seen first and foremost as a desire to be the best people we can be, to commune with other humans and live ethically and humbly together. It should not be vindictive or oppositional. Instead, it should seek to build bridges whenever possible, with whomever possible.” Stedman serves as the Interfaith and Community Service Fellow for the Humanist Chaplaincy at Harvard, a group of students, faculty, staff and alumni dedicated to building community for all Humanists, atheists, agnostics and nonreligious individuals at the institution. With a 35-year history, the chaplaincy offers service and action opportunities as well as a gathering space for like-minded people, recently making 120 scarves to be distributed by the New England Center for Homeless Veterans.

In his 1989 book Who Needs God, Harold Kushner discusses the work of anthropologist and sociologist Emile Durkheim, who investigated the purpose of religion in our lives. What Durkheim found was that the earliest forms of human religion were organized “not to put individual people in touch with God, but to put them in touch with each other” – to help people celebrate joy and lament loss as part of a community, and to be enlightened and guided through trouble by the experiences of others. Communities engaged in interfaith work often encounter groups whose beliefs and practices may at first be unrecognizable in terms of their own religion, yet their shared work casts new light on our common human values and the reality of our basic interdependence. In the spirit of social action, of uniting around shared goals to guide and support fellow human beings, is a belief in God necessary for fruitful faith-based partnerships?

Since its inception, Social Action Ministries has encouraged the involvement of people of all faiths in supporting permanent solutions to homelessness, and we continue to seek commitments from new partners who are devoted to this work. Does your community of faith or spiritual practice work with Humanist or atheist groups? Have you ever encountered these questions in an interfaith context before? What might your community gain by casting a wider net for partners in social action?

This post originally appeared on Social Action Ministries.

PaczullaLee Paczulla is an MDiv candidate at Harvard Divinity School, preparing for ordination as a Unitarian Universalist (UU) minister. She spent the last five years doing community-based youth development and health action work in Washington, DC, and has a BA in psychology and women’s studies from Swarthmore College. Lee is currently interning with Social Action Ministries, a program of the Massachusetts Housing and Shelter Alliance which seeks to involve diverse communities of faith and spiritual practice in statewide efforts to end homelessness.

  • http://thenewhumanism.org James Croft

    An interesting article, posting some challenging questions. One way of looking at it, from the Humanist side, is “Is your organization willing to make concessions in order to encourage the participation of Humanists and other naturalists?”

    For example, SAM says on its website:

    “One Family, Inc. and Social Action Ministries invite you and your faith community to join us in supporting the Patrick-Murray Administration’s plan to implement a Housing First solution to end family homelessness in Massachusetts.”

    To me, that is not an invitation, but an implied exclusion. Would the organization be willing to reframe that language to include me? Should it be willing to do so?

    What about controversial issues, like facilities and housing for transgender homeless persons? Can I expect that SAM or other similar organizations will be on board with full support for trans equality?

    It seems to me a very thorny issue, and I wonder if it might be more trouble than it’s worth to engage with explicitly faith-based organizations, and for them to try to engage with Humanists.

  • http://socialactionministries.blogspot.com Caitlin

    Thanks to NonProphet Status for including this post in your conversation, and to James Croft for your comments (which I unfortunately missed until just now)!

    I think you’re right on – organizations that work with faith communities need to carefully consider the language that they use if they want to be explicitly welcoming to Humanist and other nontheist groups. What we’re searching for now is language that does just that – language that represents us as a network in dialogue about religious and moral beliefs that lead us to social action. In a situation like that cited above, do we invite “communities of faith and conscience” or “people of all faiths and no faiths”? How do we convey in something as short as an organization’s name the value placed on the traditions, beliefs and practices from which we come, as well as the social justice for which we strive? These are not rhetorical questions – we’re hoping for ideas and insights both about what language is exclusive and what more inclusive language we can use on a consistent basis.

    Thanks for your input!

  • http://socialactionministries.blogspot.com/ Lee

    James, thanks for your comment! I also just noticed it here.

    I think your question about housing for trans people who are homeless hits on an important point. SAM supports housing solutions for all homeless individuals. People of all faith traditions, and people who identify as atheist, humanist, agnostic, non-religious, etc. have all kinds of expectations about each other based upon those labels. When a group of diverse people realizes that they do in fact agree on the value of a particular social intervention or advocacy agenda, it breaks down the stereotypes we all may carry about each other.

    Though it doesn’t always work perfectly, I think this is one of the great values of interfaith collaboration, and it is why I hope to see more communities that do not claim any faith-based identity bringing their point of view into that discourse as well. It’s exactly this kind of conversation that sets us all on a path to understanding one another better – which we can do even if we continue to disagree.

    Thanks again for your comment!

  • Brenda Lecky

    It doesnt matter what religion you have, the most important thing is what you do. .

    <a href="The latest article from our own webpage
    http://www.homeimprovementstuffs.com/tips-on-choosing-kids-lunch-bags/